Archive/Dongs 2018

You're not sure? There are definitely things of him you can't even begin to imagine ..

Like what? Please share

Don’t tease. Spill.

Good editing/shadow work from Testino. Wouldn’t mind seeing the original shots.

By Smiggi. Also for MATUK.

Please share!

I’d like to see too.

>>45295 lol every creepy gay photographer has a "private collection" of almost every model he ever shot with.. sometimes frontal nudity sometimes more

There may be frontals, but I don’t think Testino is creepy.

yeah testino isn't creepy. there are SOME legit photogs out there, lol. you can usually tell by how they photography women nude as well, like vivanco for instance (also a great photog).

i'm disappointed the new MATUK doesn't have frontals. fashion/photography is so tame lately. testino also got matty carrington nude, for the first time i think. a few years ago it would have been with frontal...

I just want to see more of Elliot.

lol cute, you guys think testino isn't creepy.

he's known for having a revolving door of hot young men coming in everyday for him to take their photos, almost all them nude. they do it because he's testin0. there was an interview with, i think, carine where she openly said exactly that.

There’s a difference between taking nude photos and being a creep, no?

Where’s this interview btw? Is it recent?

>>45713

being nude in front of a photog isn't inherently creepy. i think it says more about us that we go there straight away.

I don't understand why the word 'creepy' comes into play that much. No model is ever forced to do that - the option to just walk away is always there. There are shady photographers out there, sure, but again the models always have the option to check them out online before or decide what to do afterwards. You are here for the nudes so stop being jealous and just wait for them!

>>45801 If you can't see how this industry is exploitatory towards young men then youre either naive or stupid. If it's straight up nude shoot that's one thing, but if every shoot turns at some point to nude that's just plain wrong and creepy imo..

and stfu already with the jealousy talk.

And end scene.

Don’t models know what the shoot is about before they get there? Like they’re not going to rock up being told one thing and then it’s something completely different surely.

Anywho if somebody’s got something please bring it forward...

>>45815

yes. i remember asking lally about this a few years back lol. he said all nude shoots are confirmed with the agency and the model prior to the shoot.

i definitely think some photogs are creepy with both guys and girls, but i also think some models are very comfortable with their bodies and not ashamed to be straight up nude.

There's a difference between going on a shoot with L@lly or Rick D@y and getting shot by Testin0 or Weber or Mert+Marcu$. You know exactly what you're walking into the former. The latter 3 are such big names that if they ask you to get naked for a story because it "inspires" them, you likely will because the potential to get your face out there is worth it. The big name models like Sean O or Jon K can say no and not have it matter to their careers but if you're just starting out, you'll do it and be encouraged by your agent to do so. Just look at Trev0r S. His first shoot was with Weber and he was naked, the frontals weren't posted or published, but he was naked.

Meh. Nuttin new and interesting in here. Just a bunch of sissie faggots gossiping about "photographers, models, modeling, photo shoots" blah. blah. blah. blah. blah! And they could and would go on and on and on and on about a topic that has been discussed over and over again. This is just BOOOORIIINNGGGG. yawn yawn yawn. Meh.

>>45833 How do you know about TS nudes with Weber?

S Teitler’s got nudes of Frankie.

>>45845 Some of us are new here so stfu

>>45833

and the guys still face the same abuse / harassment regardless of who is shooting them. The industry is exploitive. Sure it might get your face / name in a major publication but you also have to live with the experience of unwanted advances, inappropriate touching... It's not for everyone.

I've those gay agents sent their models to Lally, Rick Day, Greg Vaughn, Jeremy Kost etc.they must want their model's nudes so badly.

Pretty corrupt practices. Hopefully more guys speak out.

>>45936 The guys must also be willing to do it.

So actually any other photos of Elliot or?

>>45902 no one said it wasn't exploitative - which is an actual word, the one you used, isn't.

New Charlie by MZ campaign

It‘s always gonna be exploitative because in fashion, mostly old, ugly, well connected gay ‘creative’ people are in charge of mostly young, beautiful, inexperienced and straight models. Of course they’re gonna use their position of power.

>>50105 You can naturalize it all you want it's still plain wrong

Anything new?

Bump for stories details or pics? So hot it hurts.