Archive/Dongs 2018

Who cares?

DNA Magazine gushes about body positivity, like every other magazine, then puts guys with -21345% body fat on their cover. Alas, in their eyes, this website is a theatre of cruelty. Yes, some cruel things can be said on this site, but DNA needs to think twice before taking the moral high ground. That plateau is not stable.

>>70186 i wonder what they think "revenge porn" is supposed to be

laughing hard at

>From what we are lead to believe, people can request images and information be removed from the site, however, this requires the person to identify themselves by submitting a photo holding a sign with their personal information on it. If they get the sign wrong in any way, the site uses the submitted photo to further shame the victim.

liberal media has completely lost it

>>70186
Good, they'll get more people to visit the site and help post pics.

A similar article from Instinct brought me here. I mean they aren’t wrong...that’s what this is. We might as well make our peace with it.

FWIW, I find it interesting that /dongs/ is now the most frequented board on this site now. I doubt most of you have been on here long enough to remember, but ~10 years ago the biggest site was the camwhores forum, and guys would just share their nudes willingly as local -kun camwhores. No one even used to post in /dongs/.

I don't know what's changed. I guess people learned that the internet is eternal, and if you share your nudes, they'll probably resurface forever? Where did all the camwhores go? Did they just move to Chaturbate because they learned they can get paid for their body instead of giving it away for free? I miss when this site was more faggy weeaboos and less creepy sociopaths into baiting and catfishing straight guys.

I do hate that this site has turned into people GIVING away content to people BEGGING for content and NEVER contributing anything. There's probably a very small base of people here who actually share. Everyone else is just a broke bitch who whines and then hoards when they get what they want without giving back.

>>70264 link?

>>70286

>I miss when this site was more faggy weeaboos and less creepy sociopaths into baiting and catfishing straight guys.

indeed

>>70289

Here you go: http://instinctmagazine.com/post/revenge-porn-site-cruel-and-disturbing-or-just-gays-having-fun

"If they get the sign wrong in any way, the site uses the submitted photo to further shame the victim."

LMAO! When has this ever happened!?

Interesting. This Spanish website (notorious for their clickbait) posted one day ago almost the SAME article of DNA (without giving them credit): https://www.cromosomax.com/38319-malegeneral-la-cruel-web-que-anima-a-subir-revenge-porn-gay

MG/dongs has a lot of problems but honestly don't think revenge porn, in its most true/legal definition is one of them. Not many people here are posting pics and vids just to get back at someone. I'm sure it happens but the frequency is low.

I found this place years ago, and never knew about /dongs, I was here for the camwhores from a millennia ago lol

Apparently that terrible piece of word vomit masquerading as "journalism" was written by this guy: https://twitter.com/troymurphy

Now that's a face no one would want to catfish.

>>70286
Ah, the old days, when there was J-kun and Pablo, and Matchu, and Skye, and the others. Good times.

>>70319 hahaha holy shit the liberal media is insane. Instinct author has a working brain at least. it's nice following the link trail to see how every one of those other sites is just regurgitating the same piece over and over again

>>70450

ewwww

>>70453

matchu was so sexy. tea-kun too. someone needs to start a MaleGeneral Classic thread with all the old camwhores, although maybe a bunch of them are on a no-post list by now.

i'm sad i lost all my photos of the old camwhores from here. there was Vlin who was adorable, and a really hot guy who I think went by the handle Sam Vimes who I've never been able to find photos of again.

there were lots of cute camwhores on a similar site... wtfux.org maybe? been so long I'm forgetting how, but I miss hot weeb boys getting nude for free.

>>70450 “Now that's a face no one would want to catfish.”

Exactly 👏👏👏

hahah liberal media is libtard dur dur witch hunt fake news #sad dur dur libertard freedoms dur dur haha dur dur derp dur haha dur is liberal follows brain link dur haha dank dur maga dur liberal media fake news dur

>>70541

>my parents dropped me on my head too many times

>>70445 actually in the state of California where it is a felony now to post revenge porn, and they can get a subpoena for you IP & then watch the criminal charges fly...

Under Penal Code 647(j)(4) PC, the legal definition of revenge porn/nonconsensual pornography is as follows:

You have an image of the intimate body part of another identifiable person, or an image of that person engaged in sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation or masturbation;

You intentionally distribute that image;
There was an understanding between you and that person that the image would remain private;

You know or should know that the distribution of the image will cause the person serious emotional distress; and

The person depicted suffers serious emotional distress.

(btw the servers for this site are in France, and the French have happily helped take down revenge porn sites and those that posted to them...)

>>72983 if any even exist, there might be a handful of ancient threads on this site that are actually "revenge porn", you retarded cuntrag

stop believing the dumb shit you read coming out of the msm

>>72992 sure dude. The law is exactly as quoted, not from msm. It’s considered revenge porn by the simple act of sharing without permission according to the law in California.

>>73017 you are retarded

>>72983 nobody cares GTFO