Archive/Dongs 2019

This is so darksided... this site is so hell bent on emphasizing their models are straight or whatever I bet its just them raw fucking or some sketchy sex shit.

>>85222 share them

>>85223
lol.
they aren't even willing to test their models and now you think they (the models) will be willing to go bareback?
It's probably guys that don't want the general public to see that they've done gay porn, but still want the money.

>>85384 What's tragic, it actually isn't.

It's just different pairs up of guys who have already had gay sex on there or scenes from another angle.

>>85407 So you know who is in the videos? Can you give us the details?

i have a membership, but there's no info beyond the titles when you click a video on the secret menu. it just takes you to a simple page with a black background where the video plays. so it doesn't really tell much to members (e.g. model names) beyond the same video titles that nonmembers see.

>>85589 Thank you for the screenshots!

Does not seem to be particularly exciting, right?

>>85590 cute

Are there new models or just the same ones?

>>85590 Can you please provide the url of the video/page where this screenshot is from?

Now they even don't show their new model's faces anymore in the previews. But in the preview video, you could almost see the complete cum shot. But no face. WTF?

>>87056

It's because the owners are completely singular-minded and have no clue how to run a business so they jump from obvious scheme to obvious scheme.

They saw increased engagement on social media when they did those "we'll reveal each face at xxx number of likes/retweets" so they took that as some sign from the gods that it's how they should approach every new model/preview, which is what they are now doing.

They sent out an email to affiliates saying that going forward GH won't be showing model's faces in solo previews and any affiliates who show a model's face won't get paid.

The owners of GH are complete and utter shitlords that scramble for new shitty ideas because they are shit for brains shitfags.

>>87067
Ah that makes sense, kind of. Shame that they have the hottest guys on their site, though.

How are they going to promote their future sex scenes on the preview section? "Hot anonymous young muscle hunk #3 fucks horny hot jock #16"?

>>87374 Yeah, it's truly ridiculous.

Anyway, we'll see what these 'mysterious' models look like eventually when the video is up on torrent sites and screen caps are made.

This is him. Not worth the hype.

>>87574 Thanks for this and you're totally right, not worth they hype and definitely no superstar, like they are promoting him as.

He looks like a younger brother of those two grimacing meatheads, the Hodge Twins...and with a worse case of receding hairline to boot.